Not at all 8). I love them, too. Well, all except for the third one. That one was just terrible, IMO. The only thing I really liked was the super-smart Raptors— that part of it had a lot of potential, but the rest was just too much like a B monster movie (e.g. something on par with the monster movies the SyFy channel makes/shows) for my taste
. It had too much of the "monster chases characters and kills/eats them one by one" thing, and that's pretty much what the entire plot consisted of, at least in my view. I'm hoping the fourth film will veer away from that, and be as good as at least the second film was. But we'll see.
? I had no idea there had been complaints like that. Huh :[! I actually think The Lost World struck a great balance between the two things, e.g. dinosaurs running around, causing chaos, eating a human or two (or more), etc., and an actual, substantive story. In the third film, the latter element seemed to have been all but tossed aside in favor of the former one— the complete opposite of the original film, now that I think about it.
. But after I saw it, and was shown the, IMO, awesomeness of the Raptors (e.g. one of them managing to open the door into the pantry/storage room Tim & Lex had hidden in)? Well, Mr. Tyrant Lizard King was deposed, and became my second most favorite dinosaur species. *Smiles and shrugs* Anyway, because of that, and the fact that the Raptors were made even more awesome in the third film, T-Rex's de-crowning didn't irk me as much as it sounds like it did you. Also, according to one of the paleontologists interviewed in a documentary I watched relatively recently, the Spinosaurus was actually bigger than the T-Rex. What the aforementioned scientist didn't say, though, was that the Spinosaurus was more fierce and dangerous than T-Rex. I believe the same individual theorized that Spinosaurus spent a lot of time in the water and ate fish. So while it surpassed T-Rex in size, it might not have done so in terms of ferocity and all around brute strength.
. 
.
Underwater dinosaurs? There's even no such thing... Ok, about this second one it's only a wrong terminology. But still I think they could have came up with something better, it's up to them after all.