Arwen-Undomiel.com
http://www.arwen-undomiel.com/forum/

Product Testing on Animals
http://www.arwen-undomiel.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=45&t=19442
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Manveru [ November 3rd, 2008, 5:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Product Testing on Animals

The following companies still test their products on animals. The list of these companies can be found at http://www.thevegetariansite.com/ethics_test.htm and is also listed below.
I'm asking that those of you out there who are against this sort of testing to boycott these products and/or write the companies. Also, spread the word to your friends and family. Ask them not to buy from these companies. Help me in this cause. Help the animals.

* Alcon Labs
* Allergan, Inc.
* Alpha Hydrox
* Arm & Hammer
* ArmorAll
* Arrid
* Aziza
* Bain de Soleil
* Ban Roll-on
* Banana Boat
* Bausch & Lomb
* Benckiser
* BenGay
* Block Drug Co. Inc.
* Bounty
* Boyle-Midway
* Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.
* Carpet Fresh
* Carter-Wallace
* Chesebrough-Ponds
* Church & Dwight
* Clarion
* Clairol
* Clear Choice
* Clorox
* Commerce Drug Co.
* Consumer Value Stores
* Coppertone
* Coty
* Cover Girl
* Crest
* Cutex
* Dana Perfumes
* Dawn
* Del Laboratories
* Desitin
* Diversey
* Dow Brands
* Drackett Products Co.
* Drano
* EcoLab
* Eli Lilly & Co.
* El Sanofi Inc.
* Elizabeth Arden
* Erno Laszlo
* Faberge
* Fantastik
* Fendi
* Final Net
* Finesse
* Flame Glow
* Giorgio
* Givaudan-Roure
* Glade
* Glass Plus
* Helene Curtis Industries
* Huggies
* ISO
* Jhirmack
* Johnson & Johnson
* S.C. Johnson & Son
* Johnson Products Co.
* Jovan
* Keri
* Kimberly-Clark Corp
* Kiwi Brands
* Kleenex
* Lady's Choice
* Lancaster
* Lava
* Lever Brothers
* Listerine
* Lubriderm
* Lysol
* Max Factor
* Mead
* Mop & Glo
* Nair
* Naturelle
* Neotoric Cosmetics
* Neutrogena
* Neutron Industries, Inc.
* Olean
* Oscar de la Renta
* Pantene
* Parfums International
* Pearl Drops
* Pennex
* Pfizer, Inc.
* Pine-Sol
* Plax
* Playtex Corporation
* Pledge
* Polident
* Post-It
* Prince Matchabelli
* Proctor & Gamble Co.
* Quintessence
* Raid
* Reckitt & Colman
* Richardson-Vicks
* Sally Beauty Supply
* Sally Hansen
* Sanofi
* SC Johnson & Son
* Schering-Plough
* Scotch
* Scott Paper Co.
* Sensodyne
* SmithKline Beecham
* S.O.S.
* Stanhome Inc.
* Sterling Drug
* Suave
* Sun Star
* TCB Naturals
* Tegrin
* 3M
* Tide
* Tilex
* Unilever
* Vaseline
* Vidal Sassoon
* Visine
* Vivid
* Warner-Lambert
* Westwood Pharmaceuticals
* White Shoulders
* Whitehall Laboratories
* Windex
* Woolite
* Yves Saint Laurent

Author:  Taurquende [ November 3rd, 2008, 6:42 pm ]
Post subject: 

I want to say I agree. :yes: It's wrong to take away an innocent animal's life when there are better ways to know if a product is safe.


I do want to point out on the list: Huggies? and Oscar de la Renta? *has a ridiculous picture of a lab mouse with diapers and designer clothes on* :teehee:

Author:  Manveru [ November 6th, 2008, 8:25 am ]
Post subject: 

I've made a petition for all interested:

http://www.PetitionOnline.com/CoPToA/petition.html

Author:  Nienna AnĂ¡rion [ November 10th, 2008, 12:15 am ]
Post subject: 

There is also lists on companies who do testing and don't do testing on the PETA website. You have to download it though.

Author:  Turwaithion [ November 10th, 2008, 6:52 pm ]
Post subject: 

Not to sound harsh, but would you rather test on humans? An animal is expendable, you can breed another. You can't do that with humans in the same way. And I for one, don't care if a few mice/rats/hamsters/guinea pigs/ the odd cow die for the betterment of humanity. Pastuer, anyone?

While I do agree that is a product such as diapers is so unsafe it must be animal tested, it should be boycotted, I am an avid angler and hunter, who eats the game he kills, and thus heartily dislikes PETA.

Author:  Johnny's Fan [ November 11th, 2008, 12:36 am ]
Post subject: 

If humans want to better eyemakeup and lipstick, then they should bloody well test it on themselves and suffer the consequences.

We're not on about bettering people's lives here but their stupid vanity. Granted, I am not familiar with all the products on their list, but I gather most of them are cosmetics.

To say animals are expendable because you can breed another, is so not the point, I'm struggling to figure out how to type all I want to say without getting kicked off the forum.

So I should probably leave before this turns into an argument - which it would do because I'm involved and I actually care about animals - which wouldn't be fair to Eowyn (who I totally commend for bringing this up).

And I agree with PETA on almost everything.

Author:  Star Gazer [ November 11th, 2008, 5:45 pm ]
Post subject: 

I agree that NO ONE should test their products on animals, and I am glad that someone had brought up the subject, but I am thinking that either this list is over-kill, or it's faulty. I mean things like.... Drano? Lysol? S.C. Johnson? Kleenex? Post-It? Those brands have nothing to do with animals or humans - why on earth would they be tested on animals? If they were looking for some dangerous chemical in their stuff, it seems like it would be easier -in every sense of the word- just to use a lab, rather that testing it on an animal.

Author:  Johnny's Fan [ November 11th, 2008, 6:49 pm ]
Post subject: 

^ Well I don't fully understand it either, but some tissues for example, have a scent that is meant to sooth the skin. So that is something that could be tested on mice to see if they have a reaction.

Post-its also have some sort of sticky substance so that is something else that could be tested to see if there is a reaction.

Basically, who knows what parts of products are tested on animals?

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/