Author |
Message |
|
Post subject: Posted: September 26th, 2006, 12:16 pm |
|
Joined: 02 January 2006 Posts: 5728 Location: Mithlond Country:
|
Oh, I definately like Isildur, and....I don't think he was weak. He was a very strong man, but the Ring exploits our weaknesses, and everyone has them. So he wasn't weak, but he had a weakness....an Achilles' Heel, kind of.
_________________ 
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Post subject: Posted: September 26th, 2006, 7:49 pm |
|
Joined: 19 July 2006 Posts: 6433 Location: somewhere sympathy is more than just a way of leaving
|
Ah. But if you say he wasn't weak, you are putting him above mortal man. Is that right? We are all weak. We all have our weaknesses. The Ring just had the power to draw out and exploit our weaknesses.
I like Isildur too, so we agree on that point. But I am speaking here more of the moral strength than physical. He was a very strong and brave man. But he had more than one weakness. He was weak in more than one area.
I think I was wrong to call him weak in general, but he definitely had more than just an Achilles heel, more than just one weak point. He was human after all. i don't blame him for that. In fact, I love him for that. It makes it easier to relate to him.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Post subject: Posted: September 27th, 2006, 2:11 am |
|
Joined: 02 January 2006 Posts: 5728 Location: Mithlond Country:
|
I don't think I'm putting him above mortals...he wasn't weak. Having weaknesses doesn't make you weak. Everybody has weaknesses, more than one, but I'm meaning that in general, he was a strong man. Strong morals (he was one of the Faithful on Numenor), and physical might. There are strong humans now, and weak ones. There is a range of people who give in to their weaknesses or spend their lives fighting and resisting them. I think Isildur was one of the latter, though he did give in to the Ring's temptation, and later regretted it.
_________________ 
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Post subject: Posted: September 27th, 2006, 3:52 pm |
|
Joined: 19 July 2006 Posts: 6433 Location: somewhere sympathy is more than just a way of leaving
|
Tinuviel's Tears wrote: I think I was wrong to call him weak in general, but he definitely had more than just an Achilles heel, more than just one weak point. He was human after all. i don't blame him for that. In fact, I love him for that. It makes it easier to relate to him.
That is what I have to say on the subject of him being weak as a whole.
I'm not disagreeing with you. he was strong overall. but you're talking about the Ring as if it were his one weakness. That's not the case. The Ring prayed on many of his weaknesses. Pride and greed and anger. Are not those all one of the Seven Deadly Sins? Yet we are all guilty of these at one point or another.
The point here is not whether he is weak or strong. It is whether he is good or evil. Weakness does not necessarily have anything to do with being good or evil, though it may oftentimes.
I think we have all absolutely decided that Isildur was a good, strong, brave man. My point in starting this thread was not to say otherwise. I think a lot of people think I'm saying he's evil. I'm not. I'm saying that I used to believe that, before I actually thought about it. Thinking about it, before I started this thread. I had arrived at the conclusion that Isildur was far from evil. My objective in starting this thread was to see if other people had thought he was evil at first but, like me, thought differently when they actually thought. And also to spark thought in peopls who may still assue he's evil. So you see, I actually quite like Isildur, I don't think he is weak and I don't think he is evil.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Post subject: Posted: October 3rd, 2006, 9:27 pm |
|
Joined: 03 June 2005 Posts: 13144 Location: Heaven: Rockin' with Severus Snape Country:
Gender: Female
|
What is weakness anyway? I know we've been discussing this a lot lately in many of the Boromir related threads, but I thought I'd bring it here too. What exactly is evil too?
Dictionary.com describes weakness as "[1.]the state or quality of being weak; lack of strength, firmness, vigor, or the like[2.]an inadequate or defective quality, as in a person's character; slight fault or defect[3.]a self-indulgent liking or special fondness, as for a particular thing[4.]an object of special desire; something very difficult to resist"
Out of all of these definitions only one applies to Isildur. This one would be number 4. Number 3 could apply also, but I don't think Isildur was fond of the Ring. The feelings that Isildur had over the Ring were definitely of a desiring or lusting nature. He couldn't resist the power and temptation that it offered him. I am not by any means saying that his mental capabilities were weak. Everyone shared this weakness. Sam, Galadriel, Gandalf, Bilbo, Frodo, Gollum... This characteristic comes along with humans. If you were offered the Ring, would you be able to resist?
Dictionary.com describes evil as "[1.]morally bad or wrong[2.]causing ruin, injury, or pain[3.]characterised by or indicating future misfortune[4.]bad or blameworthy by report[5.]characterised by anger or spite"
Some of us may point out that many of these evil things came about because of Isildur's taking of the Ring, but I contradict that. I do not believe that we can characterise Isildur as evil for the things he did because I do not think he intentionally did them, or even knew what would come of his actions.
So all in all, we may say that Isildur is weak for by dictionary definition he is, but we may not say that he is evil. Instead we will say that evil came from what he did.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Post subject: Posted: October 6th, 2006, 7:11 pm |
|
Joined: 19 July 2006 Posts: 6433 Location: somewhere sympathy is more than just a way of leaving
|
*applauds* Larael, you astound me. You said everything I needed to say, but didn't know how. Thank you. Excellent, excellent post.
Isildur definitely wasn't weak as a person, but he did have a weakness, the Ring. I'm not blaming him for this weakness, how could I? As Larael said, everyone shared the same weakness.
Isildur also was not evil. Again, his intentions in keeping the Ring were not bad. Bad came from his actions.
Really, Larael had said everything in the best way it can possibly be said, so I have nothing further to add.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Post subject: Posted: October 8th, 2006, 11:48 am |
|
Joined: 07 October 2006 Posts: 2474 Location: From the north I have come, need has driven me and I have passed the doors to the path of the M6
|
I spose tinuviels tears,that men represent the best and worst in middle earth, good and evil, love and hate and that they are so changable that it is hard to solidly categorize Isildur as "good" or "evil" as the ring has a great powe to corrupt as it wwas with Boromir. Wasnt galadriel sorely tempted to take the ring when Frodo offerd it to her?If a Noldoli can be brought so close to taking th ering, then we can, I think excuse people like Isildur and Boromir, weaker of will than Galadriel their mistakes. But whatever u think, I will listen to u lol.
Namarie!!!!!!!!!!!
Yeh Larael really summed it up nicely so thanks to larael 4 that and all for ur input, makes the forum so much more interesting 8) 
_________________ "This is the hour of the Shire-folk, when they arise from their quiet fields to shake the towers and counsels of the Great. Who of all the Wise could have foreseen it? Or, if they are wise, why should they expect to know it, until the hour has struck? "
Last edited by mephiston, lord of death on October 10th, 2006, 5:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Post subject: Posted: October 9th, 2006, 3:47 pm |
|
Joined: 19 July 2006 Posts: 6433 Location: somewhere sympathy is more than just a way of leaving
|
Very true Eonwe. Good thoughts. There is good and evil in all of us, so it's hardly fair to categorize someone as good or evil. Also, we can definitely forgive Men for their want of the Ring. As you pointed out, others sucumbed to its power who were far greater than Men.
I think Larael has said everything else I wished to say on the subject. 
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Boyz theme by Zarron Media 2003
|
|