Hi. I've been hearing the people on these boards talk about a hobbit movie. I just realized: there won't be one! It's because of that nassssty little prologue before the Fellowship of the Ring. It basically tells the whole story of the Hobbit. Grr...

_________________
Lady Erulissë Greenleaf of Mirkwood

^
yeah exactly. The prologue doesn't exactly tell the Hobbit story, not even really a summary of it.
So I think you won't have to worry because of that, Erulisse.
The problem is a whole different one as Aerlinn said

_________________
[!+~^$#&:;]

I'm somewhat against a hobbit movie, but I won't get into that...

Like they said, The Fellowship didn't tell the story of The Hobbit at all - just how the ring was found (basically). You should really read the book. It's very fun.

_________________
$%=#?&
<a href="http://www.politickles.com/middleearth"><img src="http://www.politickles.com/middleearth/images/linkbuttons/mebnr3.jpg" border="0"></a>

_________________
<center>

((Banner by Arweb & Avatar by TimTimTimTim))

~(Custom Avatars by Me!)~

yep its official.read it in the newspaper yesterday

_________________

The prologue didn't tell the Hobbit at all... the Hobbit's story, if you remember, concerns The Dragon and The Mountain, etc...

Riddles in the Dark is just a chapter which happens to lead to the whole LOTR Trilogy. That's all they really showed anyway.

_________________


"A man can no more diminish God's glory by refusing to worship Him than a lunatic can put out the sun by scribbling the word, 'darkness' on the walls"
~C.S. Lewis

yeah it was just telling how Gollum lost the ring and Bilbo found it.when they make the movie it will just count as a handy flashback between the Hobbit and the main trilogy.i mean u cant actually leave that part out when telling the story of the ring.

_________________
<img src="http://i3.tinypic.com/zio9sh.jpg">
^thanks to arwenevenstar.com.

"...You can always trust a dishonest man to be dishonest.Honestly,it's the honest ones you want to look out for..."