Rules      FAQ       Register        Login
It is currently April 19th, 2024, 10:12 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Missed out...
PostPosted: October 12th, 2006, 12:08 pm 
Ent
Ent
User avatar

Joined: 15 September 2006
Posts: 626
Location: With Frodo and Sam in the Shire

Offline
It's soo unfortunate that so many good scenes were missed out of FOTR. It's a real shame.

I know they were missed out for the obvious reason of time shortage, but I really believe that with the extra scenes the movie would have been so much better. It was a shame about the fact that they missed Tom Bombadil out especially! He is such a great charcter and i believe he has great value within the tale.

The scenes with the Barrow-Wights should have been put in also i believe, they would have made things so much more interesting, and the mini spiders etc.

If any of you have played the fellowship of the ring game, you'll see what i mean by how muchg more interesting the movie could have been with those bits in, I love the movie as it is, however :)

_________________
<center><font size="0">'Before you came along we bagginses were <i>very</i> well thought of...never had any adventures or did anything unexpected!''</font></br><a href="http://www.frodoforever.com/"><img src="http://www.hufflepuffpride.com/frodo/claim2.gif" border="0" width="200" height="120"></a>


Top
 Profile       WWW            
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: October 23rd, 2006, 5:56 pm 
Ringwraith
Ringwraith
User avatar

Joined: 10 June 2005
Posts: 1871
Location: Minas Tirith
Country: United States (us)
Gender: Female

Offline
I would like to have seen Bombial...that would have reall made the movie more interesting.

_________________
Image
Faith isn't the ability to believe long and far into the misty future.
It's simply taking God at His Word and taking the next step Joni Erickson Tada


Top
 Profile                  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: October 24th, 2006, 4:49 am 
Movie Extra
Movie Extra
User avatar

Joined: 22 October 2006
Posts: 16
Location: Whitstable

Offline
Though I regret that Tom wasn't in the movie I think that it was probably for the best. Non readers of the books would find him too comical in waht is a serious movie. Also he is not vital in the Quest for theDestruction of the Ring and so he was not needed in the movie. I think Christopher Lee said in teh extended edition

_________________
Hope is all we have left-Gauther

The Legend of Fletcher-The Druid War-Coming Soon


Top
 Profile                  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: October 24th, 2006, 2:49 pm 
Maia
Maia
User avatar

Joined: 22 September 2006
Posts: 4083

Offline
Agreed.

Although I know I almost always take Peter Jackson's side in everything... I've got to say he did the best he could, and he did a terrific job... made a movie that we all love, and who are we to critique him in any way? Are we movie directors? Movie experts?

I think the book and movie are both special in their own ways, and we should therefore appreciate them differently.

_________________
<center>
"The piano is able to communicate the subtlest universal truths by means of wood, metal and vibrating air."
Image
Image


Top
 Profile                  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: October 27th, 2006, 4:32 pm 
Elf
Elf

Joined: 12 September 2006
Posts: 1459
Location: The mystical forest of the Cumberland Valley
Country: United States (us)
Gender: Female

Offline
Fletcher Hawkmoth wrote:
Though I regret that Tom wasn't in the movie I think that it was probably for the best. Non readers of the books would find him too comical in waht is a serious movie. Also he is not vital in the Quest for theDestruction of the Ring and so he was not needed in the movie. I think Christopher Lee said in teh extended edition


i agree, but i can't picture Tom B. in my mind, i dunno why, but whenever i read the book, i can never imagone a guy with yellow boots! so it woulg've been cool to see him inthe movie, the Glorfindel part i would have to not agree with , but arwen doing it was a great idea, as someone on here said, we needed more girl power! but i'm not to fond of the actress....but that's my issue! :)

_________________
"Have i gone mad?"
"Yes, i believe you have. But i'll tell you a secret.... all the best people are."
Image
Hannon Le,everyone for the banners! :)
Married Khamûl on January the 26th, 2007:bones:


Top
 Profile           YIM        
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: October 28th, 2006, 12:34 am 
Maia
Maia
User avatar

Joined: 21 August 2006
Posts: 4076
Location: Out Walking

Offline
I can't picture Tom.... But I would have loved to see Goldberry!

_________________
<center>
Receiving So Much More.
Image
PM me with prayer requests
www.therebelution.com
</center>


Top
 Profile       WWW            
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: November 1st, 2006, 1:59 pm 
Ent
Ent
User avatar

Joined: 15 September 2006
Posts: 626
Location: With Frodo and Sam in the Shire

Offline
Fletcher Hawkmoth wrote:
Though I regret that Tom wasn't in the movie I think that it was probably for the best. Non readers of the books would find him too comical in waht is a serious movie. Also he is not vital in the Quest for theDestruction of the Ring and so he was not needed in the movie. I think Christopher Lee said in teh extended edition


Yes i suppose you have a good point but it would have been nice to see him included though.

What do you mean Lalaithnindil, with regards to you can't picture Tom...there can't possibly be a goldberry without Tom Bombadil...

_________________
<center><font size="0">'Before you came along we bagginses were <i>very</i> well thought of...never had any adventures or did anything unexpected!''</font></br><a href="http://www.frodoforever.com/"><img src="http://www.hufflepuffpride.com/frodo/claim2.gif" border="0" width="200" height="120"></a>


Top
 Profile       WWW            
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: November 4th, 2006, 4:00 pm 
The A-U Matriarch
The A-U Matriarch
User avatar

Joined: 04 June 2005
Posts: 13518
Location: Skógum Svíþjóðar
Country: Sweden (se)
Gender: Female

Offline
I would have LOVED to see the Barrow-Wights on screen, they seemed so incredibly cool in the book. Knowing PJ's movie magic ability they would have looked absolutely stunning!

I can understand why Bombadil was left out, as great of a character he is in the book I think he would have come out quite cheesy, boring and weird on screen and would have probably been a major confusion for the movie-goers who hadn't read the books as he really brings nothing to the Quest for the Ring which was the movie's main focus. Plus, since he is already such an engraved character in everybody's minds, perhaps more than any other character they would probably have messed him up either way.

_________________
Image

.*+I'VE MET ANTIGONE, MONTANABOHEMIAN, RAIVYNN PHOENIX, BERIADANWEN & PIRATEOFTHERINGS+*.

(¯`•¸·´¯`·._.·[TRUE VAMPIRES DON'T SPARKLE]·._.·´¯`·¸•´¯)


Top
 Profile                  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: November 8th, 2006, 5:50 pm 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: 23 October 2005
Posts: 8345
Location: Rivendell
Country: Gondor (xg)
Gender: Female

Offline
so maybe its a good thing that they left him out.

_________________
Image
- married fingon fingolfinion 6/4/13 -
~art credit~


Top
 Profile                  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: November 9th, 2006, 1:24 pm 
Ent
Ent
User avatar

Joined: 15 September 2006
Posts: 626
Location: With Frodo and Sam in the Shire

Offline
Yes. You are right, I guess the fact that he is left out has made sure that the movie can't mess him up or make him boring but the Barrow-Wights would definitley have been amazing to see. It's a shame about those., no question about that.

_________________
<center><font size="0">'Before you came along we bagginses were <i>very</i> well thought of...never had any adventures or did anything unexpected!''</font></br><a href="http://www.frodoforever.com/"><img src="http://www.hufflepuffpride.com/frodo/claim2.gif" border="0" width="200" height="120"></a>


Top
 Profile       WWW            
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: November 12th, 2006, 9:07 am 
Maia
Maia
User avatar

Joined: 21 August 2006
Posts: 4076
Location: Out Walking

Offline
One thing they could have done to fit everything in could have been to make 6 movies (like there are 6 parts in the trilogy).

_________________
<center>
Receiving So Much More.
Image
PM me with prayer requests
www.therebelution.com
</center>


Top
 Profile       WWW            
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: November 12th, 2006, 8:57 pm 
Elf
Elf

Joined: 12 September 2006
Posts: 1459
Location: The mystical forest of the Cumberland Valley
Country: United States (us)
Gender: Female

Offline
Lalaithnindil wrote:
One thing they could have done to fit everything in could have been to make 6 movies (like there are 6 parts in the trilogy).


oh yeah! more LotR and longer! i prolly couldv'e seen one in the theater!

ErulissëEnethNîn wrote:
I would have LOVED to see the Barrow-Wights on screen, they seemed so incredibly cool in the book. Knowing PJ's movie magic ability they would have looked absolutely stunning!


i can't ever picture the Barrow-Wights! i dunno why! it's so annoying! can anyone describe them to me???

_________________
"Have i gone mad?"
"Yes, i believe you have. But i'll tell you a secret.... all the best people are."
Image
Hannon Le,everyone for the banners! :)
Married Khamûl on January the 26th, 2007:bones:


Top
 Profile           YIM        
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: December 7th, 2006, 2:30 pm 
Ent
Ent
User avatar

Joined: 15 September 2006
Posts: 626
Location: With Frodo and Sam in the Shire

Offline
yeah...the barrow-wights are ghost like spirits. They don't really have a physical appearance other than being all white and faint faces...just very ghostly really. If you want a good example play the FOTR game.

_________________
<center><font size="0">'Before you came along we bagginses were <i>very</i> well thought of...never had any adventures or did anything unexpected!''</font></br><a href="http://www.frodoforever.com/"><img src="http://www.hufflepuffpride.com/frodo/claim2.gif" border="0" width="200" height="120"></a>


Top
 Profile       WWW            
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: December 11th, 2006, 11:33 am 
Dwarf
Dwarf
User avatar

Joined: 13 November 2006
Posts: 79
Location: Cyprus

Offline
here is how tom bombadil is (LOTR EE)

Image

_________________
[font=Comic Sans MS]Imagination is more important than knowledge[/font]


Top
 Profile       WWW            
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: December 12th, 2006, 1:40 pm 
Elf
Elf
User avatar

Joined: 14 September 2006
Posts: 1392
Location: Minas Tirith

Offline
I can't believe they left out Tom! I know his part o' the story was kind of slow and not entirely necessary, but they should have at leas given him a little screen time.

_________________
<center> .nph ftw.
[!~^$=+?]</center>


Top
 Profile                  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: December 12th, 2006, 11:11 pm 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: 06 May 2005
Posts: 2120
Location: midwest
Country: United States (us)
Gender: Female

Offline
I think if they really tried they could've gotten in the barrow-wights without Tom. Thing is, there'd be two sets of spooky creatures, with only one returning. I bet there'd be a way to have the Hobbits squirm out of the wight of the Barrow-wight.

_________________
Starting October 13th: globe trotting from my kitchen. Follow along on Cook In Fifty-Two


Top
 Profile       WWW            
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  




Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Boyz theme by Zarron Media 2003