Arwen-Undomiel.com
http://www.arwen-undomiel.com/forum/

Weird things in TTT...
http://www.arwen-undomiel.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=730
Page 3 of 4

Author:  Lothriel Ellinde [ June 18th, 2006, 6:07 pm ]
Post subject: 

Font face:[font=Euphemia UCAS]Speaking of weird things in TTT, Why do the elves fo to Helms Deep? And when Haldir comes he says " I bring word from Elrond of Rivendell." Why would he be bringing word from Elrond if, Haldir is from Lothlorien?[/font]

Author:  Lady~of~Isengard [ June 19th, 2006, 7:51 pm ]
Post subject: 

I think it's because Elrond and Galadriel were talking to eachother or something like that. I also beliee PJ wanted to show that the elves weren't just going to leave Middle-Earth to die.

Author:  nightcrawler [ June 22nd, 2006, 2:14 pm ]
Post subject: 

Ya I think it was a stand together type thing. Plus Haldir probably had good relations with Elrond considering he seems to be friends with many people.

Author:  estelio_han [ June 28th, 2006, 11:14 pm ]
Post subject: 

Did anyone notice that in the little battle on the edge of Fangorn and the horse rears up over Pippin his hands are untied and flung out, but just a few seconds later we see him crawling with his hands tied and then cutting them on the rock to get them off?

I thought that was rather strange...lol

Author:  Lothriel Ellinde [ July 2nd, 2006, 1:07 am ]
Post subject: 

Indeed, that is quite strange.

Author:  Angrod Alcarin [ July 5th, 2006, 4:17 am ]
Post subject: 

I really don't mind all those mistakes in Lotr. I'm happy with the movie on itself and its still brilliant.

Author:  Elenthari [ April 10th, 2007, 11:59 am ]
Post subject: 

The filmed version of The Two Towers was very different from the book.I've noticed some weird things too.I don't remember any elven help at Helm's Deep in the book.Or the arrival of Eomer.Wasn't he with King Theoden already?I rembember that Gandalf arrives with Erckenbrand,not with Eomer! :annoyed:

Author:  Elenthari [ April 10th, 2007, 12:01 pm ]
Post subject: 

But to be honest I like the movie too!:)

Author:  Aerandir [ April 11th, 2007, 9:08 am ]
Post subject: 

Yes, in the book, Éomer was already at Helm's Deep, and Gandalf came with Erkenbrand, and, as I recall "a thousand men of the Westfold," or some such thing.

Author:  Elenthari [ April 11th, 2007, 9:13 am ]
Post subject: 

Aerandir wrote:
Yes, in the book, Éomer was already at Helm's Deep, and Gandalf came with Erkenbrand, and, as I recall "a thousand men of the Westfold," or some such thing.
Hey-good memory :D!

Author:  Aerandir [ April 11th, 2007, 9:22 am ]
Post subject: 

I read it only a month or two ago, so it's still fresh in my mind. :)

Author:  Elenthari [ April 27th, 2007, 7:21 am ]
Post subject: 

Good point.
Yes,it would be strange a new character to apper(for those which never red the book).Anyway I love the Lotr movies :P

Author:  Miriel [ July 16th, 2007, 12:05 am ]
Post subject: 

Hey, the only reason why I look for glitches is just because I love the story so much that I want to do everything with it that I can! :D :D :D :D :D :D

Okay, what about this. The riders of Rohan first ride up. They're all on horses, there are no horses without a rider. Ya with me?

Well, then Eomer calls Hasufel and Arod and in a mere two seconds they come forward, riderless. Nobody could have dismounted without taking any time or making any noise.

Then the riders of Rohan ride away...and still everybody has a horse.

:blink: :bounce: :blink: :bounce: :blink: :bounce:

:o :o :o :o :o :o :o

Author:  Aredhel Ar-Feiniel [ July 16th, 2007, 12:42 am ]
Post subject: 

Maybe you just didn't see them... horses bearing riders are easier to spot than riderless horses. It's not like they zoomed in on each and every horse just to show you that they all bore riders. Hasufel's former master, Garúlf, was slain... and his steed was left riderless. Arod's late master probably met the same fate, as well. So nobody had to get off any horse.

Author:  Miriel [ July 16th, 2007, 11:08 pm ]
Post subject: 

I knew that, at least that was what it said in the books. But in the movies it showed a bird's eye view of the group of riders, and there were no riderless horses. I checked it carefully; and I'm pretty sure PJ didn't have two riderless horses at the beginning when they first ride past.

Eh, I dunno, maybe I'm wrong. But that was what I saw. Maybe I should watch it again.

Author:  Ashwise [ July 31st, 2007, 3:20 pm ]
Post subject: 

Treebeard as Tom Bombadil, I thought that a little wierd.

Page 3 of 4 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/