Rules      FAQ       Register        Login
It is currently March 28th, 2024, 8:07 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

How would you like to see official usergroup-clubs started by the website?
yes (post reason) 44%  44%  [ 17 ]
maybe (post reason) 15%  15%  [ 6 ]
no (post reason) 41%  41%  [ 16 ]
Total votes : 39
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: July 9th, 2008, 8:37 am 
Hobbit at Heart
Hobbit at Heart
User avatar

Joined: 04 June 2005
Posts: 11662
Location: Smeag's Island (Where the inevitable is evitable)

Offline
The only major pro I have seen is what Ellie has said, but that only requires one group, and a bucketload of rules for that group.

Zandian-I wouldn't say the groups would be clique because they are not going to put together that way, and cliqueness isn't necessarily a bad thing. If everyone is part of a group, it can bring a sense of unity to that group, and it may also be less intimidating to newcomers.

Would this only add boards? Or would you like, make the Fan Art section available to one group and not another?

_________________
<center>

Image


Top
 Profile       WWW     YIM        
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: July 9th, 2008, 6:52 pm 
Welcomator
Welcomator
User avatar

Joined: 10 July 2005
Posts: 23149
Location: Where there are handsome heroes and sexy villains.. all that need some lovin' ;)
Country: Gondor (xg)
Gender: Female

Offline
Hmm. I would only say make a group if i's for the people who want to debate and everything.

I have been on a forum with groups (I was a Ranger :P) and to be honest, the rivalry between the groups was quite shocking. "I'm an Elf, you're an Orc" yada yada yada. So we Rangers had some threads others couldn't see. Big whoop. It wasn't really anything that special really.

AU already has little groups. We know this. But any WT'er will tell you, we'll welcome you with open arms to our little group. And I believe the same can be said for other little clubs etc on AU. If we're all put in different groups and have our own little areas... eh... I don't think it is possible to stop any slight seperation between members.

So, yeah. Give the debators their own group. :yes:

_________________
Image

Image

^ By me and my SS *squiggle hugs*


Top
 Profile       WWW            
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: July 9th, 2008, 10:58 pm 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: 03 June 2005
Posts: 13144
Location: Heaven: Rockin' with Severus Snape
Country: England (en)
Gender: Female

Offline
I definitely agree with those who are worried about dividing this forum up ever more than it already is. We've tried so hard in the past for unity, and I'd hate to see all of that go to waste.

Thank you, Ellie, for explaining about the usergroups. I'm going to assume the mods are discussing things on their own right now since no one seems game for answering our questions.


Top
 Profile                  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: July 10th, 2008, 8:45 am 
Istari
Istari

Joined: 19 May 2007
Posts: 2156

Offline
No. :no: I'm not for this idea. I don't want AU to be divided up. One of the greatest things AU was, was that it was a gigantic forum, with members from all walks of life, who came together because they shared one strong thing: a love for LotR. I loved having at least the possiblity of getting to know many, many people... if you separate the forum into usergroups... well, I think it will take away that unity.

But, if people think it's really necessary... I wouldn't objecy to a debate usergroup.


Top
 Profile                  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: July 11th, 2008, 1:34 am 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: 04 February 2006
Posts: 9445
Location: Southeast of the Northern part of West Hyglemr
Country: Rohan (xr)
Gender: Female

Offline
Well, the debate issue has been covered (thanks Arweb!) so my vote is no.

I don't see a reason to make groups. What would one group be wanting to see that another wouldn't? If it's all LotR, as Haldir guessed, it just doesn't make sense that some people could see some things and others couldn't. I really don't see the point. As to the clique-ness, sure we have cliques on here. But I believe they are good cliques. In a way, each club, the WT, graphics people, etc. are all kind of cliques. But each group is welcoming to anyone else who comes into the forum, and you can be a "member" of all of them. So while we do have some people we talk to more than others or see around more than others, I don't see a need to set a clear divide between them.

_________________
going on a journey through my old claims
Image
Image


Top
 Profile       WWW            
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: July 12th, 2008, 12:47 am 
Ringwraith
Ringwraith
User avatar

Joined: 10 June 2005
Posts: 1689
Location: Wherever Frodo is, there I'll be

Offline
I vote no, except for a possible debate group. My reasons have pretty much all been said. I think we're divided enough as it is, and i'd like to keep our unity as one big forum. I don't visit many threads often, but i always know i can if i want to, and that people in that thread will be friendly towards a fellow AU-er, even one they don't know that well. I'm not saying the friendliness would stop with the addition of groups, but as i said i like the unity and also the "free range" quality of the forum now.

_________________
Image
Avi and banner by ForeverFrodo. Words on banner by me.
Proud Frolass
Resident Elvengoth


Top
 Profile                  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: July 23rd, 2008, 12:25 pm 
Vala
Vala

Joined: 29 August 2006
Posts: 5815
Location: Dancing under the stars in Lorelindorenan

Offline
I would really rather there not be usergroups, for reasons already posted. :)

_________________
<center>-In Christ alone my hope is found, He is my light, my strength, my song-
Image
^JF is awesome

There will come a time with no more tears
and love will not break your heart but dismiss your fears
</center>


Top
 Profile       WWW            
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: July 29th, 2008, 2:24 pm 
Maia
Maia
User avatar

Joined: 01 November 2005
Posts: 4785
Location: Middle Earth

Offline
Eh. The idea sounds like fun on the surface, but there's really no need for it, and it's likely to make us more divided and the forum less accessible for new members.

So, I wouldn't hate it if it happened, but no. Why bother?

_________________
<center> all we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to us
Image

Thank you for five-plus wonderful years of obsession, friendship and fun


Top
 Profile                  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: September 4th, 2008, 5:43 pm 
The A-U Matriarch
The A-U Matriarch
User avatar

Joined: 04 June 2005
Posts: 13518
Location: Skógum Svíþjóðar
Country: Sweden (se)
Gender: Female

Offline
Does this really have to create more cliques though? It's not really any different than being a Maia or a Tolkien Scholar like our ranks [just more permanent and obvious] and it's certainly not any more different than all the other clubs we already have going. If we have been able to survive and conquer all the past clique wars we can survive and conquer anything!

This forum is already somewhat divided. These usergroups might actually help break those cliques up a bit because I hardly think everyone who is friends with one another will join the exact same usergroup. It's just a fun idea to show your fellow forum members where you feel like you belong. It's really not that serious.

_________________
Image

.*+I'VE MET ANTIGONE, MONTANABOHEMIAN, RAIVYNN PHOENIX, BERIADANWEN & PIRATEOFTHERINGS+*.

(¯`•¸·´¯`·._.·[TRUE VAMPIRES DON'T SPARKLE]·._.·´¯`·¸•´¯)


Top
 Profile                  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: September 4th, 2008, 11:18 pm 
Maia
Maia
User avatar

Joined: 01 November 2005
Posts: 4785
Location: Middle Earth

Offline
Those are good points Eru, and like I said before, I don't think that usergroups would hurt the forum as much as there's just no need for them. We can already form clubs and such to talk to each other--plus you can join many of those and none are invisible. :yes:

In the words of PD...

[quote=Calloniel (PD)]Well, what smeag said was more of what I was saying here. Dividing AU up into a bunch of sections just doesn't make sense to me if it's worked fine this far. And sure we have lots of cliques here, not that that is a good or bad thing (in it's place), but since we already have those cliques do we really need extra sub-forums to just enhance them?[/quote]

Agreed. I think that usergroups would really only enhance the same benefits and quibbles we have now because of cliques and such, not change them or really benefit them. I don't see the need...

And of course it might be a fun little way to choose a 'rank'-type category and meet new people. But it doesn't seem like it would do much. :P

_________________
<center> all we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to us
Image

Thank you for five-plus wonderful years of obsession, friendship and fun


Top
 Profile                  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: September 6th, 2008, 11:18 pm 
Istari
Istari
User avatar

Joined: 02 February 2007
Posts: 2563
Location: Valinor
Country: Gondor (xg)
Gender: Female

Offline
I say no. I like to be able to see what others say, and restricting acsess to non-group members that are members of the A-U forum seems unfair to me. It's like saying that they aren't good enough to belong.

_________________
Image
Married Artemis Fowl on July 16, 2007
[!+^$%=#?&]
The Seemingly Nice But Actually Really Nasty Nazgul
School ate my life. *sigh*


Top
 Profile       WWW     YIM        
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: October 30th, 2008, 8:53 pm 
Istari
Istari
User avatar

Joined: 07 October 2006
Posts: 2474
Location: From the north I have come, need has driven me and I have passed the doors to the path of the M6

Offline
I think that Usergroups wouldnt necessarily be a bad thing. They could be used to allow people who like debate on topical issues the freedom to do this, in a controlled environment, where a mod has, (to use a phrase from my WoW mates' vocabulary) "Kicking priveleges". So if anything kicks off, the offending member(s) can be isolated, and the incident dealt with without a forum wide brouhaha. I know that Arweb said "No debate societies", but I think that its going to be a thing that will always be there. In specifying the terms on which such a thing would be allowed, the Mods and Admin will have provided an honourable concession to members, and retain control of the situation.

As for the clique thing, well, is the military's system of dividing battalions into companies,and companies into units cliquey? If we are so concerned about this, then just have members randomly picked and assigned to a particular usergroup, like troopers in a squad. This usergroup could have its own forum,like a bulletin board, and this might help to free up sticky space and such on the main communal threads. Exceptions such as debate societies could be set up, with Mod control over who enters,(invitation only?) and these could be kept to a minimum.

If anything, such groupings would help welcome newbies, as there would be a large number of people ready to welcome them into their respective group. We could even have WT'ers who worked in each usergroup to promote friendlienss to newbies, and possibly have group officers, who maintain discussion and possibly act as the first line in stopping any trouble (like fights/trolling/flaming)

As for dividing the forum, I think that social interaction would still continue as normal, and I believe that a random set up would help get people who previously had not talked to each other, talking.Old cliques and mistrusts run deep, so make new trusts, and new "cliques" to help fill them in is what I say.

But at the end of the day, its all down to Arweb and the Mods. This forum is essentially a dictatorship (a kind one though :P) so, although I think that it might not be a bad idea, given correct implementation, well, its down to them

Mephiston

_________________
"This is the hour of the Shire-folk, when they arise from their quiet fields to shake the towers and counsels of the Great. Who of all the Wise could have foreseen it? Or, if they are wise, why should they expect to know it, until the hour has struck? "


Top
 Profile                  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: November 9th, 2008, 9:24 pm 
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: 03 June 2005
Posts: 4079
Location: In my dreams
Country: United States (us)
Gender: Female

Offline
A definite "nay" on my part.

It's an interesting premise, but I am one of those who see it as only dividing people up. Most of us are part of little cliques that we've fallen into, and a lot of us are part of more than one, so to say. Others interchange between them. And of course they're all very open and welcoming. So to say that "You are in this group with these people" is a bit extreme to me, even if we do get to chose. It excludes people. I see a lot of potential for people to start thinking, well, I do really like my group but that group looks like it's a lot of fun, too, and I wish I could be part of it, too. Or you could be a new member, join a group, and then make a friend from another group and want to switch over. Or all your friends could be scattered. So it's just impractical and excluding.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile                  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: November 10th, 2008, 3:55 pm 
Queen of Eregion
Queen of Eregion
User avatar

Joined: 16 March 2006
Posts: 20465
Location: Gondolin
Country: Canada (ca)
Gender: Female

Offline
Opinion of mine has changed; too much trouble and thought for something so simple... I'd stick to what we've got now, I don't see the point of doing all that for something that might work. What's the purpose of having those anyway, I fail to see.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile       WWW            
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: March 28th, 2009, 8:54 pm 
Ringwraith
Ringwraith

Joined: 24 February 2007
Posts: 1811
Location: In my library, unconvering dark and mysterious secrets...

Offline
Larael wrote:
I definitely agree with those who are worried about dividing this forum up ever more than it already is. We've tried so hard in the past for unity, and I'd hate to see all of that go to waste.


I agree with Larael.

_________________
Image

Thanks Nurratiel, *Ennostiel*, PD, and Githoniel

Image


Top
 Profile                  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: April 2nd, 2009, 10:29 am 
Istari
Istari
User avatar

Joined: 18 January 2006
Posts: 2198

Offline
sounds like fun!

_________________
<a href="http://www.arwen-undomiel.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=20020" target="_blank"><img src="http://i43.tinypic.com/2ias6qf.jpg" border="0" alt="COME AND REQUEST SOME PHOTOS, OR JUST BROWSE"></a>
<a href="http://tinypic.com" target="_blank"><img src="http://i40.tinypic.com/2a7bz81.jpg" border="0"></a>


Top
 Profile       WWW            
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  




Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Boyz theme by Zarron Media 2003