Author |
Message |
|
Post subject: An irritating little Legolas trend Posted: August 23rd, 2008, 8:15 pm |
|
Joined: 02 February 2007 Posts: 2563 Location: Valinor Country:
Gender: Female
|
Before I start, I apologize if I unwittingly offend anyone in the following statement. This is my personal opinion and I don't expect others to share in my beliefs, but...
I was looking for Legolas realated stuff recently, and was shocked  , irritated  , and slightly embarrassed  at what I found. There is an overabundance of effeminate Legolas stuff out on the internet these days: slash fics, slash pics, random whining, and general sissiness. Legolas always struck me as a more macho character, generally handsome, but definately not a sissy pretty-boy like everyone else says he is. I mean, what self-respecting elf male likes to be compared to a bunch of females? Not many I suspect. So, does anyone else want to see poor Legolas get his dignity back?
_________________  Married Artemis Fowl on July 16, 2007 [!+^$%=#?&] The Seemingly Nice But Actually Really Nasty Nazgul School ate my life. *sigh*
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Post subject: Posted: August 25th, 2008, 9:26 pm |
|
Joined: 01 November 2005 Posts: 4785 Location: Middle Earth
|
It's true; ever since the movies everyone has made fun of Legolas as being girly, mainly because of his ever-perfect hair and not very intelligent additions tot he conversation.
This goes back to my initial frustration with how Legolas was portrayed in the movies; he should have been given a larger role other than Captain Obvious; it would have been especially nice to see him take a role of leadership, as in the books, instead of being Aragorn's sidekick; and a side conversation with at least one of the hobbits in the fellowship might have been appreciated.
As for the perfect-hair-and-stuff issue, yes, it would have been nice to see a bit more dirt on Legolas. But nevertheless, HE'S AN ELF. Being somewhat-perfect and slightly-aloof is sort of a part of who they are. Did any other elves suggest differently? Elrond may have had more facial expressions and been quicker to anger, but certainly they can't complain about Legolas' 'emotionlessness' when compared to, say, Celeborn.
So again. I wish they had portrayed Legolas differently, and the foundation for such teasing is certainly present, but Really. Get mature already. When you look at Legolas through the lenses of Middle-Earth he is in no way effeminate.
_________________ <center> all we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to us
Thank you for five-plus wonderful years of obsession, friendship and fun
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Post subject: Posted: August 25th, 2008, 9:28 pm |
|
Joined: 16 March 2006 Posts: 20465 Location: Gondolin Country:
Gender: Female
|
I blame Orlando Bloom and PJ for this mess. The book Legolas wasn't that ditzy.
_________________ 
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Post subject: Posted: September 9th, 2008, 10:02 pm |
|
Joined: 29 May 2007 Posts: 1186 Location: Somewhere far away
|
The slash and teasing have indeed gotten out of control. Personally, I am sick of this whole thing. I am not pleased with the complete portrayal of Leggy in the movies, but come on! When I first saw him, the thought of him being a sissy never even crossed my mind. On the contrary, I thought he seemed super macho and manly, even more so than he had sounded to me when I read the books. From the cave troll to the oliphaunt at the end...I don't know where the sissy stuff is coming from.
Besides, don't blame Orlando. PJ, maybe, but not Orlando because he was doing what he was told and he delivered his lines and acted his actions in a very non-sissy way! 
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Post subject: Posted: September 9th, 2008, 10:13 pm |
|
Joined: 13 August 2006 Posts: 1407 Location: Montana Country:
Gender: Female
|
I guess I'm torn on the issue. I come from that strange breed of person who likes to make fun of all their favorite book/movie characters, and seeing them acting the total opposite of their character can be amusing, if done in good taste. But sometimes--as with the sissy-Legolas stuff, it gets annoying and overdone. Legolas is definately not a sissy.
_________________  and I'm still a dreamer, a believer I've lost my faith in so many things but I still believe in You
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Post subject: Posted: September 9th, 2008, 11:07 pm |
|
Joined: 16 March 2006 Posts: 20465 Location: Gondolin Country:
Gender: Female
|
Miriel wrote: Besides, don't blame Orlando. PJ, maybe, but not Orlando because he was doing what he was told and he delivered his lines and acted his actions in a very non-sissy way! 
I felt otherwise.
_________________ 
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Post subject: Posted: September 10th, 2008, 9:42 am |
|
Joined: 29 May 2007 Posts: 1186 Location: Somewhere far away
|
What do you want? And what did you think was sissy about him? I'm listening...
_________________ ~Follower of Christ~
~Extreme Evanescent~
~Claimed Elladan July 03, 2007~ :3
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Post subject: Posted: September 10th, 2008, 10:55 pm |
|
Joined: 16 March 2006 Posts: 20465 Location: Gondolin Country:
Gender: Female
|
Miriel wrote: What do you want? Huh? Miriel wrote: And what did you think was sissy about him? I'm listening...
Everything.
_________________ 
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Post subject: Posted: September 11th, 2008, 7:44 pm |
|
Joined: 01 November 2005 Posts: 4785 Location: Middle Earth
|
By 'what do you want' I think Miriel meant, how would you prefer Legolas to have been portrayed? (I think. Am I right Miriel?)
As for me I don't think everything he did was sissy but Legolas neither came out seeming particularly 'macho'. Macho doean't describe elves, really It sounds like a football player or a caveman.  Elves naturally have a gracefullness and calmness that sort of doesn't give that picture, IMHO. Not that Legolas wasn't 'manly', just not in the human sense of the word. (But I agree that the portrayal in the movies could have been better. There are times that I cringe while watching because I know all of the horrible jokes that can be made from one line or picture.)
_________________ <center> all we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to us
Thank you for five-plus wonderful years of obsession, friendship and fun
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Post subject: Posted: September 15th, 2008, 5:04 pm |
|
Joined: 29 May 2007 Posts: 1186 Location: Somewhere far away
|
Yes, that was what I meant. I agree with you that macho doesn't sound right describing elves...I used it to describe the movie Legolas because with all the fighting and stuff he did...you know. Orlando's personality coming through at times.
_________________ ~Follower of Christ~
~Extreme Evanescent~
~Claimed Elladan July 03, 2007~ :3
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Post subject: Posted: September 15th, 2008, 8:00 pm |
|
Joined: 10 July 2005 Posts: 23149 Location: Where there are handsome heroes and sexy villains.. all that need some lovin' ;) Country:
Gender: Female
|
I am one of the first people to say that Legolas in the films could have been much better. I even started a thread about it. Pointing fingers at who is to blame isn't going to really help.
I actually think, it is we, the audiences fault that LOTR does contain some imperfect characters. For PJ and everyone else to have spent so much time creating every single character as they were in the book, ultimately, there would have been cries from everyone "it's too long, get on with it, we don't need this character to say as much or do as much just for added character".
Basically, whatever or whoever does not have a direct impact on the journey of the Ring, had to be cut down. Legolas is ALWAYS with Aragorn. Aragorn is the hope of Men and Middle-earth. It is really going to work, that his Elven friend is this super cool character who everyone just wants to be like? No, it's not, because Aragorn is who we should be focused on.
Now, I'm not saying that is any excuse for the character of Legolas in the films. But, it does seem to me, that he is almost superficial when you compare him to other characters within the 12 hour timeframe who actually do have a major impact on the story. Like, Gimli, he is just a character who goes along and helps. If LOTR had been 4 hours films each, I'm pretty sure Legolas would have been more like he was in the book. But if his book character was going to drag down a film or make you watch him more than Aragorn, that was not going to happen.
Orlando Bloom. Ah. PJ didn't mess up once with the casting of LOTR, so I believe Orlando Bloom did the best he could, with the character given. Perhaps now he is much more experienced, he may have made him into something more. A bad character can be given a bit more ooomph, by a very good actor.
I don't hate Legolas. I wouldn't call him a sissy. He took down a whole mumakil for goodness sake. He got right into the fighting, it was hardly like he sat on a rock combing his hair. 
_________________ 

^ By me and my SS *squiggle hugs*
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Post subject: Posted: September 16th, 2008, 3:49 pm |
|
Joined: 29 May 2007 Posts: 1186 Location: Somewhere far away
|
I always say that there are already a few long, drawn-out, unnecessary parts that they could have cut down if they needed more time. But whatever, it's no use complaining cause it's too late now obviously.
_________________ ~Follower of Christ~
~Extreme Evanescent~
~Claimed Elladan July 03, 2007~ :3
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Post subject: Re: An irritating little Legolas trend Posted: October 11th, 2008, 12:15 am |
|
Joined: 01 August 2008 Posts: 119 Location: Lothlórien (Florida)
|
Movie-Legolas =
Freya Baggins wrote: a sissy pretty-boy
They fecked up his character pretty good, I'll say.. it's depressing.
_________________ 
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Post subject: Posted: October 12th, 2008, 10:19 am |
|
Joined: 04 November 2005 Posts: 19521 Location: In a pudle on Naboo with dragon kind and ents and Jedi and wolves living in the Last Homely House!
Gender: Male
|
lol this is actually a kind of a musing subject for me. (no offense to anyone)
But on one side you have die hard Legolas fans (mostly girls I think)
And on the other you have a lot of people who for some reason don't like legolas.
My personal opinion is that a lot of people think Legolas is sissy because first, he has avery slender build (but elves are suposed to) Also he has verry "pretty" (so to speak) hair that is almost girly... but again... elves are suposed to.
So I'm gonna say from a human perspective he may seem a litt... girlish. But you have to keep in mind he is not human, he's an elf.
*shrugs* thats my take on the whole thing.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Post subject: Posted: October 20th, 2008, 4:25 am |
|
Joined: 04 June 2005 Posts: 6223 Location: where the heart is Country:
Gender: Female
|
..while reading this thread, I was getting a little heated under the collar
..until I read JN post, phew!
Thank goodness, someone thinks the same way I do..exactly!
- Leggie is supposed to be a lithe, elegant, willowy male...with long hair and pointed ears - how is that not going to be girlish, in RL?
- but Leggie isn´t RL, he is from one of the greatest written adventures, ever!
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Post subject: Posted: October 20th, 2008, 11:10 am |
|
Joined: 04 November 2005 Posts: 19521 Location: In a pudle on Naboo with dragon kind and ents and Jedi and wolves living in the Last Homely House!
Gender: Male
|
*nods*
It's kind of like saying a male dog is petite... the ord petiet actually means small... (ogs are small)
But you have to keep in mind the context of the race and factor in the fact that that IS masculan for an elf. 
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
Boyz theme by Zarron Media 2003
|
|